Skip to main content

SmartPhone Pwn2Own Results Reflect Security of the Device?

Since the CanSecWest conference last week a few people on the net have been reporting (Gizmodo, Slashdot, Engadget) that because none of the smartphone platforms were compromised (I think there was only a single attempt if I heard right) and that these devices must be inherently secure or a lot harder to hack than Safari and the rest of the browser crew.

After hanging out with a few of the researchers at the conference, and witnessing first-hand some of the technical prowess they possess, it seems a little strange to me that the security of these handsets pose a challenge to these people.

Adding to my skeptisim is the fact that many of the researchers at the conference were supporting the stance of "no more free bugs". Which I support - as there is a very real thriving underground economy for bugs and exploits - and researchers deserve to get compensated for the knowledge and expertice, not to mention that the pwn2own contest rules sign-over ownership of the bug to TippingPoint (ZDI) for basically the cost of the hardware plus 10K.

My theory on why the smartphones survived the pwn2own ordeal is not that they are uber-secure, but that the researchers know that the bugs they have for them (and based on what these guys can do on platforms that have been secured for years they DO have them) felt that the compensation that they were being offered does not even come close to the value the bugs have to other potential buyers and future uses.

I would argue that bugs on these platforms are much more valuable than say a browser exploit, or Vista hack, as taking control of a smartphone with its advanced functionality, personal connection to the owner and lack of security awareness for the platform.

Anyway, my little theory on smartphone security.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local Classified Penny Auction Scam

While there are a lot of new posts regarding the new ways to exploit people using novel techniques and 0day exploits, there continues to be a rash of tried and true methods of coercion.  I want to just walk through a simple example and reflect on how effective these methods continue to be. Many people turn toward online classified sites to buy and sell items online.  This example starts with kijiji.ca which even I've used on occasion to find used electronics and other items.  Doing a search on the site for a " Samsung Galaxy Note 2 " returns a posting from today with someone selling one for an unreasonably priced unit. $125 for a $500 phone?, but what if it's for real?  No harm in just asking some simple questions.  Email sent with some obvious questions regarding the condition and location. About an hour passes before I get a response from what appears to be a legit seller. Notice no answer to the questions I asked, but a friendly pointer at where th

Touch ID - Distributed Fingerprint Lookup

All the press regarding the new Touch ID fingerprint biometric on Apple's new iPhone has brought some insight into how to misuse this service.  Most of the critics have focused on circumventing the device to gain access or Apple deciding to share the data with the Government. One interesting perspective that I haven't seen covered yet is if the system could be used as a distributed matching system for existing fingerprint image systems.  In an over simplified view of the process, a law enforcement agency can take an acquired fingerprint and search for patterns in the database of collected prints and spit out possible matches. Although Apple states that an API won't be available for apps, it is conceivable that such an interface might exist, and provide the ability to take an acquired print (either from the iPhone hardware or from software) and check it for validity against the stored print. There are some limits to this, as there is likely only going to be one prin

Edmonton HeartBleed Information Session - April 16th, Royal Glenora Club

Since the latest major OpenSSL vulnerability was publicly disclosed, many people and organizations are scrambling to understand, respond and prepare themselves for the future.  Twitter, vendor support channels and media outlets have been quick to cover different angles of the issue but there has been overwhelming amount  of information released. With all this information, it can be difficult to understand what's relevant.  To help clarify we holding a special ISACA sponsored 2-hour session on Wednesday, April 16th, starting at 12:00pm at the Royal Glenora Club.   Benoit and I will be attempting to explain as much of the issue as we can from a technical and non-technical perspective, discussing the vulnerability, its scope with relation to our personal and professional lives and other related concerns such as our trust in the public PKI system.  The second hour we will be an interactive discussion about how others are dealing with problem, questions about related topics,